Love it. Been arguing the same. Time and Space are not cojoined and not a dimension. As you said, Time is independent and is in fact a human invention. The speed of light is also incorrect which negates a lot of what we are told is an 'age' of something. Space is not curved, JWT etc reveal that our universe is prob a flat disc or at best slighly curved.
Great to see this coming through in random threads online. The next step will be to realise that Eastern metaphysics already had these definitions in spades, named as gods because they were irrefutable laws of the universe. Another name for time for example, is Shiva or even Kali, or one of the many definitions of it. This also helps the Electric Universe model gain relevance.
I also plan to post a summary of the Electric Universe theory in coming months. It goes a long way towards providing a more plausible explanation of gravity, redshift, stars and black holes.
Very good perspective. Is scalar energy faster than the speed of light? Do elements have the ability of transmutation? Are Maxwell equations complete and correct? Is a proton a proton or is it a black hole? I feel science stopped and was settled in the 1920's.
Isn't it interesting that people adhering to a certain theory or position in physics today attempt to reinterpret Einstein's work so as to add weight to that theory/position? Block Universe theory, for example. It's like "if we can show Einstein believed the same, we'll get it across the finish line of acceptance."
But Newton in his water bucket experiment....and Galileo said....you know Kant thought...yeah, well what if they are all wrong or were biased and were torturiing their data (or worse).
Right on the mark. I distinguish between citing a big name to assess his/her position or work as against citing someone as appeal to his/her authority. The former is healthy and the latter corrupt.
Interesting that today you need a phd to put on a tie, but all the greats were without domain, pretty happy dude degrees. I do not recall Edison or real inventors being worried about tensor calculus nonsense. A farmer had more relevant wisdom than a grad spouting Kantian or Einsteinian cant. Einstein in the 1920s, started the slur that those who disagreed with him were racist :)
So true and actually sad that science - like the rest of knowledge - has been hijacked and held hostage by these self-interested groups. As a book reviewer I've come across some real gems that never made news but also seen some lower quality stuff that actually won or were nominated for the Nobel Prize (politically correct) and are known worldwide as modern-day classics.
Why do you think Einstein wanted to push science in the wrong direction? Do you think he was trying to integrate Kant’s philosophy from his Critique of Pure Reason - which suggested that our knowledge is shaped by the way our minds interpret experience - into the realm of natural science?
Or do you think there was there another reason motivating him?
National security, they call it. Cant have peasants running around with real knowledge about the world they live in. They might use it to rock the boat, and who wants that?
One only has to fire up Sid Meier's Civilization to prove that Einstein's definition of time was wrong.
Yes! I remember playing that in the ‘90s. Centuries of progress can be achieved in the space of an hour!
Love it. Been arguing the same. Time and Space are not cojoined and not a dimension. As you said, Time is independent and is in fact a human invention. The speed of light is also incorrect which negates a lot of what we are told is an 'age' of something. Space is not curved, JWT etc reveal that our universe is prob a flat disc or at best slighly curved.
Great to see this coming through in random threads online. The next step will be to realise that Eastern metaphysics already had these definitions in spades, named as gods because they were irrefutable laws of the universe. Another name for time for example, is Shiva or even Kali, or one of the many definitions of it. This also helps the Electric Universe model gain relevance.
Thanks Aria.
You may be interested to read this post that talks about Shiva in relation to particle physics:
https://open.substack.com/pub/brentshadbolt/p/what-is-real?r=wp0ny&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I also plan to post a summary of the Electric Universe theory in coming months. It goes a long way towards providing a more plausible explanation of gravity, redshift, stars and black holes.
einstein was a thief and a grifter.. not just wrong.
Very good perspective. Is scalar energy faster than the speed of light? Do elements have the ability of transmutation? Are Maxwell equations complete and correct? Is a proton a proton or is it a black hole? I feel science stopped and was settled in the 1920's.
Isn't it interesting that people adhering to a certain theory or position in physics today attempt to reinterpret Einstein's work so as to add weight to that theory/position? Block Universe theory, for example. It's like "if we can show Einstein believed the same, we'll get it across the finish line of acceptance."
Appeal to authority.
But Newton in his water bucket experiment....and Galileo said....you know Kant thought...yeah, well what if they are all wrong or were biased and were torturiing their data (or worse).
Right on the mark. I distinguish between citing a big name to assess his/her position or work as against citing someone as appeal to his/her authority. The former is healthy and the latter corrupt.
Interesting that today you need a phd to put on a tie, but all the greats were without domain, pretty happy dude degrees. I do not recall Edison or real inventors being worried about tensor calculus nonsense. A farmer had more relevant wisdom than a grad spouting Kantian or Einsteinian cant. Einstein in the 1920s, started the slur that those who disagreed with him were racist :)
So true and actually sad that science - like the rest of knowledge - has been hijacked and held hostage by these self-interested groups. As a book reviewer I've come across some real gems that never made news but also seen some lower quality stuff that actually won or were nominated for the Nobel Prize (politically correct) and are known worldwide as modern-day classics.
He wasnt just wrong. He knew its fake and had a agenda pushing science into bullshit avenues.
Why do you think Einstein wanted to push science in the wrong direction? Do you think he was trying to integrate Kant’s philosophy from his Critique of Pure Reason - which suggested that our knowledge is shaped by the way our minds interpret experience - into the realm of natural science?
Or do you think there was there another reason motivating him?
National security, they call it. Cant have peasants running around with real knowledge about the world they live in. They might use it to rock the boat, and who wants that?